Pittsburg County Genealogical and Historical Society, Inc.
E-mail: choctawnationit@sbcglobal.net

My input to FB


I have made a decision (after 20 years of dedication to FTM), I have spent half of my budgeted research time this year qualifying Family Tree Maker 2014 and converting 2012 files to 2014, and it has been wasted. The result is half of the files will not allow me to edit them, and I am unable to merge my files back into one, the principle reason for purchasing the 2014 version in the first place. I am looking for recommendations for a genealogy software package that will manage 20,000+ names in one file with 7000 links to media (images). I will give preference to a program that will import the FTM 2014 files, maintain the links to the media, and maintain the citations. I would also like to have the program rank the sources by their degree of evidence and provide outputs based on the evidence ranking. On line training like YouTube would also be a plus (I really like the training provided by Crista Cowan for FTM and will miss it). Any recommendations?
December 11
Robert O. Pulse Teresa Ghee Elliott I know I am asking a lot - I started with FTM in 91 - DOS version and did most every upgrade along the way - It is time for change - You are correct, Genealogy has come a long way, but i believe we are rounding the top of the curve, and if I got 22 out of the last commitment, the next should be worth 30. What I am really looking for a is a user interface that last 30 years with no more changes than the first DOS version of FTM to FTM2013. Now that is a lot of change, but I can adjust to it, and still get research done.
December 11
Robert O. Pulse Thank You Jeff Jahn I have access to three family members on MyHeritage - I was not aware that they had offered a separate software package until this message - will look at it.
I did evaluate cloud genealogy systems some time ago, I had the one Ancestry has for a while, but dropped it when they published my data and did not protect the living. Something they have corrected now, but I did not even realize it was an Ancestry company until a relative complained and I read the fine print.
MyHeritage is different it is an Israeli company; I assume the servers are in Israel and fall under their privacy laws. My family members on their system have discussed this and we are ok so far. I like Israeli engineers, they find unique solutions, so I will add this software to the to be evaluated list http://www.myheritage.com/family-tree-builder...
Family Tree Builder - Free genealogy program - MyHeritage
www.myheritage.com
Download Family Tree Builder - excellent free genealogy software. Downloaded more than 5 million times.
December 11
Robert O. Pulse Karla Von Fumetti Staudt Thank you that is very important - I have just about exhausted Ancestry and working German Church records now - and of course, Family Search is the best place to do that research. Will check that aspect out
December 11
Robert O. Pulse Sarah L M Christiansen Karla Von Fumetti Staudt reading that version 8 of Legacy supports Family Search - does anyone have experience with this?
December 11
Robert O. Pulse Well I am a little better off than most - many years ago, I built a filing system based on ID numbers, in each file is all the media and a HTML time line, the time line has links to all the media. I have not kept it up to date, but it is only two years behind. All I have to do is update this filing system, build the new file in the new program using Gedcom. I may not even rebuild the links to the media from the software, my filing system works just fine, and I have control over it. I have never loaded all my information into FTM it contains 20 somethin picture albums and 30+ envelopes of photographs. I just took an count and counting the html pages there are over 100,000 documents in that folder.
December 11
Robert O. Pulse Sorry 30,000 files
Robert O. Pulse You get to the larger files if you do everyone in a county for a society (other responses on this site) or in my case I agreed to be the family genealogist for the reunion and our family came over in 1737 -
Robert O. Pulse Sue Clifford Maxwell Thank You for the information, I think you answered all my questions, but I will have more as i review these programs more.
Robert O. Pulse MyHeritage - Tel Aviv, Israel - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MyHeritage Jana Thompson - It really looks forward looking and appears to be biger than Ancestry in the areas i am interested in and I already have 3 family members using it. Like the Photo ID aspects -
MyHeritage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
MyHeritage is a family-oriented social network service and genealogy website. It allows members to create their own family websites, share pictures and videos, organize family events, create family trees, and search for ancestors.[1][2] With over 75 million users, MyHeritage is one of the largest si...
December 12 at 8:53am · Like · Remove Preview
Robert O. Pulse Peggy Baldwin RootsMagic is gaining appeal to me - several people have contacted me beyond this site for it - I have given myself till the 19 to make a decision (the RootsMagic special goes off on the 20th) - Thank You for your input, I do NOT want to follow your path, this is going to be painful enough getting the media out of FTM and organized. Frankly, my citations could use updating, I have not been consistent, and continue to learn. I cannot remember, but one of the programs I reviewed this week, seemed to have tools for doing citations/Evidence consistently, was that RootsMagic? Can you share more about your experiences with citations and evidence in RootsMagic, how is the user interface, does it make suggestions for form/content, what is the gradient in Evidence i.e., 5 levels or more?
I guess I am asking if it followers: https://www.evidenceexplained.com/?
December 13 at 10:47am · Like
Robert O. Pulse Janelle Vandervort Dvorak all programs have problems and I am willing to put up with a number of them (and have in the past), someone above put it best, I need to find a package that addresses my needs and that is the reason for my questions - I am trying to find a partner in this genealogy quest that shares my values, and I know both of us will fail from time to time, but we can get over the rough spots. I do regular back-ups (monthly) and have a 22 year history of backups (now all migrated data DVD’s, not many machines play 250Mbit tapes anymore), I kept duplicate media files separate from program files until two years ago, and now I regret that, but I believe the files are retrievable (will see after the 20th). The point is that I do my share to maintain data integrity, and I am flexible with problems that occur from time to time. I really appreciate your feedback, I was not living under the illusion that these programs are faultless, and was getting a little concerned that all I was hearing was good news. I have found that if I understand the faults in software and develop workarounds, that I feel better using it. So anyone that has experienced something about these packages that concern them, I would like to hear that, I can judge if I can work around it, and in some cases it may not be important to me.
December 13 at 1:37pm · Like · 1
Robert O. Pulse I made a decision to go with RootsMagic at this time, the process and documentation of the conversion process as it proceeds can be found at http://www.pittsburgcogenealogical.org/.../S.../Index%20.htm Note this is under construction and spelling is not one of my strong suits.
Turn-out was outstanding – Thank You!!!! – Comments are welcome and My experiences in converting to RootsMagic will be updated as I go along.
Changing Software PCGHS
www.pittsburgcogenealogical.org
PCGHS - How to get the most out of the Library
9 minutes ago · Like · Remove Preview
Two weeks ago I came to the following conclusions;
1. I will have to have FTM2014 as long as I use ancestry because it is the most efficient method of moving data from the ancestry databases to my computer, but I am in the process of migrating to Family Search for my primary search database, and all FTM advantages fall away in that scenario.
2. There is a disconnect between how I believe a genealogical software package and the way FTM2013/2012/2010/2008 is performing, and that the marginal utility of using the FTM is less than the high threshold for moving to another package.
3. I started a research process utilizing the members of this group to help me analyze my options - the turn-out was outstanding, and I appreciate all the input
Like you, I find navigating stings in FaceBook to be frustrating and one of its major flaws, and since I do a lot of html work I have tracked the feedback here: http://www.pittsburgcogenealogical.org/Advanced/Software/Index%20.htm Note this is under construction and spelling is not one of my strong suits. I offer it to you if you make similar decision to mine. The high threshold to change is documented in Steps in the Process of Conversion section.
 

Contents

The society exist on the dues of its members, sales of its publications, and donations.

Last Update: November 19, 2016 10:57 PM
Copyright© 1998 by Pittsburg County Genealogical and Historical Society, Inc. - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
113 East Carl Albert Parkway; McAlester, Oklahoma 74501-5039; Phone: 918-426-0388